rabbit igg  (Bio-Rad)

Journal: iScience

Article Title: FOXE1 promotes the progression of pulp inflammation by activating PANoptosis in dental pulp cells

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115204

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mixed infection with S.m. and F.n. induced PANoptosis in DPCs (A–H) Dental pulp cells were infected with S.m. (MOI = 100), F.n. (MOI = 100), or a combination of S.m. (MOI = 100) and F.n. (MOI = 100) or treated with PBS (negative control, NC) for 8 h. (A) Dental pulp cells were treated with PBS, S.m. , F.n. , or a combination of S.m. and F.n. ( n = 5 experiments in each group), and cell death was quantified by measuring LDH release. (B) Dental pulp cells were treated with PBS, S.m. , F.n. , or a combination of S.m. and F.n . Treated DPCs were stained with PI, fixed, counterstained with DAPI, and visualized under a microscope. Scale bars, 100 μm. (C) Quantification of the proportions of PI-positive cells in B ( n = 6 experiments in each group). (D) Dental pulp cells were treated as indicated and analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) PANoptotic DPCs were quantified by determining the percentages of PI + /annexin V + cells ( n = 3 experiments in each group). (F) The protein levels of cleaved caspase-3 p17, cleaved GSDMD NT, and p -MLKL were assessed by Western blot. (G) Immunofluorescence staining of PANoptotic markers in infected DPCs, as visualized using a confocal microscope. Scale bars, 10 μm. (H) Quantification of PANoptotic cell proportions in DPCs treated with PBS, S.m. , F.n. , or a combination of S.m. and F.n. ( n = 8 samples in each group), corresponding to (G). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA (A, C, and E) or by Kruskal-Wallis test (H).

Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used in this study: human and mouse vimentin (1:200, #ab92547, Abcam), human cleaved caspase-3 (1:100, #9664, CST), human cleaved GSDMD (1:100, #36425, CST), human p-MLKL (1:100, #PA5-105678, Invitrogen), mouse cleaved caspase-3 (1:100, #BF0711, Affinity), mouse cleaved GSDMD (1:100, #ab255603, Abcam), mouse p-MLKL (1:100, #ab196436, Abcam) and mouse FOXE1 (1:50, #55363-1-AP, Proteintech).

Techniques: Infection, Negative Control, Staining, Microscopy, Flow Cytometry, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence

Journal: iScience

Article Title: FOXE1 promotes the progression of pulp inflammation by activating PANoptosis in dental pulp cells

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115204

Figure Lengend Snippet: Identification and validation of FOXE1 as a key transcription factor that regulates PANoptosis in DPCs (A) Differentially expressed gene analysis was performed between the PANoptotic DPC cluster (cluster 1) and other DPC clusters (clusters 0, 2, 4, 5, and 6) and between cluster 1 and all remaining clusters. The candidate regulators were selected from the overlapping DEGs between these comparisons. (B) The top five candidate regulators were identified after comparison. (C) siRNA targeting FOXE1 (20 μM) was transfected into DPCs with Lipofectamine 2000 for 24 h. The knockdown efficiency was validated by qRT-PCR ( n = 3 experiments in each group) and Western blot. (D–H) Dental pulp cells were pretreated with siRNAs (20 μM) targeting candidate regulators for 24 h, followed by infection with S.m. (MOI = 100) and F.n. (MOI = 100) for 8 h. (D) Cell death was quantified by the LDH release assays ( n = 5 experiments in each group). (E, also see in ) Cell death was assessed by PI staining ( n = 4 experiments in each group). (F) Treated cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. (G) PANoptotic DPCs were quantified by determining the percentages of PI + /annexin V + cells ( n = 3 experiments in each group). (H) Western blot analysis was used to assess the expression of cleaved caspase-3 p17, cleaved GSDMD NT and p -MLKL. (I) Immunofluorescence staining of PANoptotic markers in si FOXE1 -and siCON-transfected DPCs. Scale bars, 10 μm. (J) Quantification of PANoptotic DPCs in I ( n = 5 samples in each group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 by Student’s t test (C, G, and J) or by one-way ANOVA (D and E).

Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used in this study: human and mouse vimentin (1:200, #ab92547, Abcam), human cleaved caspase-3 (1:100, #9664, CST), human cleaved GSDMD (1:100, #36425, CST), human p-MLKL (1:100, #PA5-105678, Invitrogen), mouse cleaved caspase-3 (1:100, #BF0711, Affinity), mouse cleaved GSDMD (1:100, #ab255603, Abcam), mouse p-MLKL (1:100, #ab196436, Abcam) and mouse FOXE1 (1:50, #55363-1-AP, Proteintech).

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Comparison, Transfection, Knockdown, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Infection, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Immunofluorescence

Journal: iScience

Article Title: FOXE1 promotes the progression of pulp inflammation by activating PANoptosis in dental pulp cells

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115204

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mixed infection with S.m. and F.n. induced PANoptosis in DPCs (A–H) Dental pulp cells were infected with S.m. (MOI = 100), F.n. (MOI = 100), or a combination of S.m. (MOI = 100) and F.n. (MOI = 100) or treated with PBS (negative control, NC) for 8 h. (A) Dental pulp cells were treated with PBS, S.m. , F.n. , or a combination of S.m. and F.n. ( n = 5 experiments in each group), and cell death was quantified by measuring LDH release. (B) Dental pulp cells were treated with PBS, S.m. , F.n. , or a combination of S.m. and F.n . Treated DPCs were stained with PI, fixed, counterstained with DAPI, and visualized under a microscope. Scale bars, 100 μm. (C) Quantification of the proportions of PI-positive cells in B ( n = 6 experiments in each group). (D) Dental pulp cells were treated as indicated and analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) PANoptotic DPCs were quantified by determining the percentages of PI + /annexin V + cells ( n = 3 experiments in each group). (F) The protein levels of cleaved caspase-3 p17, cleaved GSDMD NT, and p -MLKL were assessed by Western blot. (G) Immunofluorescence staining of PANoptotic markers in infected DPCs, as visualized using a confocal microscope. Scale bars, 10 μm. (H) Quantification of PANoptotic cell proportions in DPCs treated with PBS, S.m. , F.n. , or a combination of S.m. and F.n. ( n = 8 samples in each group), corresponding to (G). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA (A, C, and E) or by Kruskal-Wallis test (H).

Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used in this study: human and mouse vimentin (1:200, #ab92547, Abcam), human cleaved caspase-3 (1:100, #9664, CST), human cleaved GSDMD (1:100, #36425, CST), human p-MLKL (1:100, #PA5-105678, Invitrogen), mouse cleaved caspase-3 (1:100, #BF0711, Affinity), mouse cleaved GSDMD (1:100, #ab255603, Abcam), mouse p-MLKL (1:100, #ab196436, Abcam) and mouse FOXE1 (1:50, #55363-1-AP, Proteintech).

Techniques: Infection, Negative Control, Staining, Microscopy, Flow Cytometry, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence

Journal: iScience

Article Title: FOXE1 promotes the progression of pulp inflammation by activating PANoptosis in dental pulp cells

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115204

Figure Lengend Snippet: Identification and validation of FOXE1 as a key transcription factor that regulates PANoptosis in DPCs (A) Differentially expressed gene analysis was performed between the PANoptotic DPC cluster (cluster 1) and other DPC clusters (clusters 0, 2, 4, 5, and 6) and between cluster 1 and all remaining clusters. The candidate regulators were selected from the overlapping DEGs between these comparisons. (B) The top five candidate regulators were identified after comparison. (C) siRNA targeting FOXE1 (20 μM) was transfected into DPCs with Lipofectamine 2000 for 24 h. The knockdown efficiency was validated by qRT-PCR ( n = 3 experiments in each group) and Western blot. (D–H) Dental pulp cells were pretreated with siRNAs (20 μM) targeting candidate regulators for 24 h, followed by infection with S.m. (MOI = 100) and F.n. (MOI = 100) for 8 h. (D) Cell death was quantified by the LDH release assays ( n = 5 experiments in each group). (E, also see in ) Cell death was assessed by PI staining ( n = 4 experiments in each group). (F) Treated cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. (G) PANoptotic DPCs were quantified by determining the percentages of PI + /annexin V + cells ( n = 3 experiments in each group). (H) Western blot analysis was used to assess the expression of cleaved caspase-3 p17, cleaved GSDMD NT and p -MLKL. (I) Immunofluorescence staining of PANoptotic markers in si FOXE1 -and siCON-transfected DPCs. Scale bars, 10 μm. (J) Quantification of PANoptotic DPCs in I ( n = 5 samples in each group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 by Student’s t test (C, G, and J) or by one-way ANOVA (D and E).

Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used in this study: human and mouse vimentin (1:200, #ab92547, Abcam), human cleaved caspase-3 (1:100, #9664, CST), human cleaved GSDMD (1:100, #36425, CST), human p-MLKL (1:100, #PA5-105678, Invitrogen), mouse cleaved caspase-3 (1:100, #BF0711, Affinity), mouse cleaved GSDMD (1:100, #ab255603, Abcam), mouse p-MLKL (1:100, #ab196436, Abcam) and mouse FOXE1 (1:50, #55363-1-AP, Proteintech).

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Comparison, Transfection, Knockdown, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Infection, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Immunofluorescence

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: Inflammatory arthritis irAE may represent a unique autoimmune disease primarily driven by T cells but likely not autoantibodies

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aea4262

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A to G ) PBMCs from the patients with irAE were cultured in the plate coated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 (10 μg/ml) in the presence of IgG1 isotype control or anti–human IL-6R (50 μg/ml), anti–human IL-12p40 (50 μg/ml), and anti–human IFNAR1 (50 μg/ml) for 3 days; n = 9. (A) Expression of CD38 and CD127 on CD8 + T cells. Right: Percentage of CD38 + CD127 − CD8 + T cells. (B and C) CD8 + T cells activated for 5 days were restimulated with PMA, ionomycin, and monensin for 5 hours. (B) Expression of granzyme B and IFN-γ. Right: Percentage of granzyme B + IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells. (C) Expression of perforin and IFN-γ. Right: Percentage of perforin + IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells. [(D) and (E)] MFIs of GluCy5 (D), TMRM, and MTDR (E) in CD8 + T cells were presented. [(F) and (G)] CD4 + T cells activated for 5 days were restimulated with PMA, ionomycin, and monensin for 5 hours. (F) Expression of IL-21 and IL-2. Right: Percentage of IL-21 + IL-2 + CD4 + T cells. (G) Expression of CD38 and CXCR5 on CD4 + T cells. Right: Percentage of CD38 + CXCR5 − CD4 + T cells. Data in graphs represent mean ± SEM. Significance was tested paired Student’s t test [(A) to (G)].

Article Snippet: PBMCs from patients with irAE were thawed and rested in a complete medium for 1 hour and then activated with plate-coated anti–human CD3 and anti–human CD28 (10 μg/ml) with IgG1 isotype control (Bio X Cell, catalog no. CP174) or a combination of anti–human IL-6R 50 μg/ml; Bio X Cell, catalog no. SIM0014), anti–human IL-12p40 (50 μg/ml; Bio X Cell, catalog no. SIM0020), and anti–human IFNAR1 (50 μg/ml; Bio X Cell, catalog no. SIM0022) for 3 days.

Techniques: Cell Culture, Control, Expressing